Penerapan Alat Peraga Forward-Reverse untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar pada Praktikum Pengendalian Motor Listrik (The Implementation of a Forward-Reverse Demonstration Tool to Improve Learning Outcomes in Electric Motor Control Practicum)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.68437/jejpte.v6i2.14Keywords:
teaching aid, forward-reverse, single-phase induction motor, learning media, electric motor practicumAbstract
This study aimed to examine the implementation of a forward-reverse teaching aid for a single-phase induction motor as a learning medium and to identify changes in students’ understanding in the Electric Motor Control Practicum. A quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design was employed. The participants were 12 students. Data were collected through pretests, posttests, and a student response questionnaire following learning activities using the forward-reverse teaching aid. The findings showed that the students’ mean score increased from 83.33 in the pretest to 90.83 in the posttest, representing an increase of 7.50 points. The teaching aid enabled students to connect their understanding of control circuits with direct observation of contactors, push buttons, timers, overload relays, interlocking systems, and changes in motor rotation. Students’ responses to the teaching aid reached 78.33%, categorized as agree. The study was limited to 12 students and employed a single-group design without a control group; therefore, the observed improvement cannot be attributed solely to the teaching aid. The assessment also focused primarily on conceptual understanding rather than detailed practical skills. The findings imply that the teaching aid can support practical learning by connecting theoretical concepts with concrete learning experiences.Downloads
References
Álvarez Ariza, J., & Nomesqui Galvis, C. (2023). RaspyControl Lab: A fully open-source and real-time remote laboratory for education in automatic control systems using Raspberry Pi and Python. HardwareX, 13, e00396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2023.e00396
Bait-Suwailam, M. M., Jervase, J., Al-Lawati, H., & Nadir, Z. (2023). An active learning computer-based teaching tool for enhancing students’ learning and visualization skills in electromagnetics. International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, 69(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2023.144331
Castañeda-Miranda, V. H., Luque-Vega, L. F., Lopez-Neri, E., Nava-Pintor, J. A., Guerrero-Osuna, H. A., & Ornelas-Vargas, G. (2021). Two-dimensional Cartesian Coordinate System Educational Toolkit: 2D-CACSET. Sensors, 21(18), 6304. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186304
Ghazali, A. K., Ab. Aziz, N. A., Ab. Aziz, K., & Kian, N. T. (2024). The usage of virtual reality in engineering education. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2319441. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2319441
Guerrero-Osuna, H. A., García-Vázquez, F., Ibarra-Delgado, S., Mata-Romero, M. E., Nava-Pintor, J. A., Ornelas-Vargas, G., Castañeda-Miranda, R., Rodríguez-Abdalá, V. I., & Solís-Sánchez, L. O. (2024). Developing a cloud and IoT-integrated remote laboratory to enhance Education 4.0: An approach for FPGA-based motor control. Applied Sciences, 14(22), 10115. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210115
Fakir, M., & Mallik, R. (2025). The success of contextual learning from engineering teacher training students’ learning outcomes in Bangladesh. Jurnal Edunitro, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.53682/edunitro.v5i1.10757
Fania, M., Iriani, T., & Arthur, R. (2024). Improving vocational student competencies through industrial class-based experiential learning. Jurnal Pensil, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v13i1.38151
Khalid, M., Fathiah, F., & Gufran, G. I. Y. (2024). Trainer kit module for DC motor speed control using voice commands based on Arduino. Jurnal Edunitro, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.53682/edunitro.v4i2.8588
Kattel, B., Hutchcraft, W. E., & Norell, E. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of flipped learning in an upper-division undergraduate electrical engineering course. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00378-2
Koloway, R., Ronga, W., Sumual, H., Olii, D., & Takaredase, A. (2024). The influence of vocational theory competency test results on vocational practice competency test results. Jurnal Edunitro, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.53682/edunitro.v4i1.8090
Lavado-Anguera, S., Velasco-Quintana, P.-J., & Terrón-López, M.-J. (2024). Project-based learning (PBL) as an experiential pedagogical methodology in engineering education: A review of the literature. Education Sciences, 14(6), 617. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060617
Li, J., & Liang, W. (2024). Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 19(12), e0316269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316269
Mallek, F., & Hamam, H. (2024). Role of activity-based learning and ChatGPT on students' performance in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100219
Menegasse, N., & Dias, C. (2024). A new approach using simulation of physical models with augmented reality to teach electrical engineering: A case study using electromagnetism. Dialogia, 50. https://doi.org/10.5585/50.2024.27417
Norambuena, N., Ortega, J., Muñoz-La Rivera, F., Covarrubias, M., Valín Rivera, J. L., Ramírez, E., & Galleguillos Ketterer, C. I. (2025). Integrating digital twins of engineering labs into multi-user virtual reality environments. Applied Sciences, 15(7), 3819. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073819
Pitterson, N. (2023). Teaching complex introductory concepts in a sophomore circuits course: A descriptive case study. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101022
Popli, N. K., & Singh, R. P. (2024). Enhancing academic outcomes through industry collaboration: Our experience with integrating real-world projects into engineering courses. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00300-w
Saha, P. (2022). Effectiveness of in-class Excel-based active learning activities for transportation engineering courses. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.879174
Salgado Sánchez, P., Rosado Lebrón, A., Borshchak Kachalov, A., Oviedo, Á., Porter, J., & Laverón Simavilla, A. (2024). A laboratory set-up for hands-on learning of heat transfer principles in aerospace engineering education. Thermo, 5(4), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/thermo5040045
Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Da Silva-Ovando, A. C., & Palma-Mendoza, J. A. (2024). Experiential learning labs for the post-COVID-19 pandemic era. Education Sciences, 14(7), 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070707
Tucker, T., Hathaway Goldstein, M., & Mercier, E. (2023). Understanding the impact of product characteristics on groups’ collaboration during a dissection task. Studies in Engineering Education, 4(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21061/see.98
Tuli, N., Singh, G., Mantri, A., & Sharma, S. (2022). Augmented reality learning environment to aid engineering students in performing practical laboratory experiments in electronics engineering. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00207-9
Vodovozov, V., Raud, Z., & Petlenkov, E. (2022). Active blended learning engineering students: A case study. Education Sciences, 12(5), 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050344
Yang, L., Xiao, S., Wang, T., Shi, Y., & Driggs-Campbell, K. (2024). Robotics via experiential active learning with immersive technology: A pedagogical framework designed for engineering curricula. IEEE Access, 12, 65706–65715. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3393473
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wiwin Rahman; Hari Anna Lastya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
